I would like to share my views on how best we can manage scope in our projects. Before that let me define scope. I define scope as list of requirements for which you are expected to provide solutions. For an application development project, scope can be the list of business requirements, for an infrastructure project it can be the list of servers which you might need to provide support/upgrade, etc., Each item can be classified as High/Medium/Low in terms of priority/business criticality for the team to focus on high priority items.
Now, a never ending challenge for the project managers is scope change or scope creep. I would say that scope change is easier to manage as I think there would be a change control board who approves the change considering the impact in terms of solution, time, cost.
What I think is difficult to manage the scope creep i.e., business intentionly or unintentionly adds new items to the scope list but without any body else notice, and without additional cost or time impact.
As a project manager, one of the main duty is to manage the scope of the project. I can outline the basic steps in order to better manage the scope and to avoid any scope creep.
Organize the requirements.
Requirement traceability matrix (check the template here)
If you dont have the agreed requirement register in place, business/clients have the easier excuse to tell you that you have missed while requirement analysis/capture phase.
Better we organized ourselves better and save the project team from the scope creep.
Loading…
The process, which has been listed, will enable a project manger to control the scope changes alone. It’s not mandatory that scope creep will happen in the requirement phases. Scope creep will happen in the subsequent phases as well. People who are handling the project always try to be nice to client and during the execution or during the UAT client will be adding a smaller requirement which the project manager may not be seeing the bigger picture will accommodate that in to the project once the project gets over the extra bite of goodies that has been accommodated without any effort/cost logging will impact the any or all of the triple constraints. So to mitigate the scope creep whatever the minor change that comes in any of the phases it has to be directed to the change control board and proper effort/cost estimation has to be done.
Hi,
Good starting place for scope management. Change is inevitable, and not always a bad thing. What is key is a repeatible scope management standard understood by the sponsor and project team. I have an example here, if you would like to check it out.
Hope this helps,
Elyse